IBX’s $22.5M Settlement: A Chart Review Compliance Lesson
A $22.5M settlement shows how a chart review program meant to catch bad diagnosis codes can itself become the liability when findings aren’t acted on.
·
A $22.5M settlement shows how a chart review program meant to catch bad diagnosis codes can itself become the liability when findings aren’t acted on.
·
A 19-year sentence in a $1B DME fraud case is a reminder of what documentation gaps CMS and OIG auditors are actively hunting for in brace and DME claims.
·
OpenEvidence’s Coding Intelligence suggests and sequences CPT codes in real time. Compliance teams should know what that changes — and what it doesn’t.
·
A Fifth Circuit panel pressed HHS hard on its RADV audit rule during Oct. 5 oral arguments. Coding and compliance teams shouldn’t wait for a ruling to act.
·
AHA says BCBS’s $942M AI-coding intensity analysis skipped the medical records entirely. For coding and compliance teams, the underlying test still matters most.
·
OIG found 172 of 230 sampled UnitedHealthcare Texas diagnosis codes unsupported, projecting $24.4M in overpayments. Here’s what it means for coders.
·
CMS is backing AI-driven claims review with billion-dollar contracts to catch documentation errors before they become improper payments. Coders should take note.
·
The AMA’s 2027 CPT set splits code 97155 in two and retires two Category III codes. Coders have about 15 weeks to update systems before the Jan. 1 deadline.
·