Fifth Circuit’s RADV Skepticism: What It Means for Coders
A Fifth Circuit panel pressed HHS hard on its RADV audit rule during Oct. 5 oral arguments. Coding and compliance teams shouldn’t wait for a ruling to act.
·
A Fifth Circuit panel pressed HHS hard on its RADV audit rule during Oct. 5 oral arguments. Coding and compliance teams shouldn’t wait for a ruling to act.
·
AHA says BCBS’s $942M AI-coding intensity analysis skipped the medical records entirely. For coding and compliance teams, the underlying test still matters most.
·
OIG found 172 of 230 sampled UnitedHealthcare Texas diagnosis codes unsupported, projecting $24.4M in overpayments. Here’s what it means for coders.
·
CMS is backing AI-driven claims review with billion-dollar contracts to catch documentation errors before they become improper payments. Coders should take note.
·
The AMA’s 2027 CPT set splits code 97155 in two and retires two Category III codes. Coders have about 15 weeks to update systems before the Jan. 1 deadline.
·
Abridge’s new pre-bill review tool flags DRG and POA mismatches against clinical documentation before claims go out — a compliance play as much as a coding one.
·
CMS’s PY2024 RADV audits are underway, and a recent $2.4M settlement shows what happens when HCC codes don’t hold up. Here’s what coding teams need to know.
·
CMS is asking whether the AMA’s CPT coding monopoly still serves patients. A copyright lawsuit filed weeks later raises the stakes for coding teams.
·